I saw the twist as the V's being the ACTUAL intent of Scripture!
Yeah, I recognized that premise as well. It was too obvious to miss. My logical mind rejected it out of hand as being plausible only in this movie's alternate world written by an author who likes to apply random, out of context scripture to a fantastic premise. Conflicts?
As you noted, the V held a cross and... well, nothing.
Catholics regularly use Holy water; not an advisable practice for a V.
Jesus and the rest regularly traveled by day.
Jews ate garlic regularly as part of their diet.
Jesus was crucified along side the other two in the normal way, not by sunlight or driving a stake through his heart.
Saul was converted on the road to Damascus by a blinding light from heaven, not glowing eyes in a cave.
Judas hung himself, not burned himself up in the sun, gobble up garlic, or drive a stake through his own heart.
Jesus and his apostles constantly talked bout being sons of light or the light of the word. Darkness was described by them as from the evil one. This would be the exact opposite of the world of a V.
and on and on...
... I could go on absolutely forever on this line of logic, but no, let's just run with the silly premise... what if Jesus was a V? Sure, I can go with this for fun, but I can't take it seriously. Any more than I went with those movies where Jesus had a wife and child or Jesus was gay and in love with John.
You don't have to be a Christian to reject these premises outright; you just have to know scripture as most of us on this board already do, willingly or not, believer or not.